Environment
and Sustainability Committee
Inquiry into Energy
Policy and Planning in Wales
EPP 258 – June Watts
Dear
Sir/Madam,
I am writing to show my objection to the
development of more windfarms and National Grid proposals for
pylons in MidWales Powys. I strongly oppose all proposals for the
following reasons:
VISUAL IMPACT:
The ugly visual sight of theese hideous pylons together with the
lines, wind farms and hub creeping accross our beautiful landscape
is just not acceptable.
the use of landmap grading which does seriously undervalue our
untouched landscape.
The area is dependant on the beauty of its visuals to bring in
tourism and your proposals will seriously effect this fact.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC:
There are many buisnesses around this area relying on tourism. My
husband, an artist who sells his works of the local scenery to
clients and tourists who want paintings of this beautiful
countryside would no longer have a buisness if proposals go ahead.
Who would want a watercolour painting of a line of pylons ripping
through this beautiful countryside. People would just stop coming
and long standing clients would discontinue their interest.
There are many caravan sites who rely on the tourists and many Bed
and breakfasts. These people visit to see not only the beautiful
countryride but the famous sites such as castles and historical
homes, they go walking amongst the wild uplands of powys. They
visit to see the wildlife which will also be effected by the
destruction you propose o the habitat of wildlife.
Next door to us we have a very successful recording studio (foel
studio). What effect wll pylons and lines have on yet another
buisness. People come from all over the world to record here, not
only to record but to relax in the peaceful, beautiful countryside.
Also we have an outward bounds activity center for mostly
city children who love to experience the tranquility of the
countryside, to be able to escape from the industrial rat race of
the city.Your proposals would end this experience for these
children and effect this buisiness.
This is also a low fying tactical training area for the M O D and
RAF Shawbury and any development would effect their ability to
train.
POOR CONSULTATION:
My family have had to travel 12 miles to the nearest consultation
events, this is being absolutley stupid as we have our own
community centre 'Rhiwhiriaeth' just 2 miles away. We tried to
arrange a meeting with the National Grid and SPEN but National Grid
refused to attend so we had to have only SPEN at our consultation.
Manny people arrived at this meeting and were very dissapointed
with the National Grid and felt quite insulted. Considering
this area has been targeted I feel this very inconsiderate.
Most people in mid wales were expecting to have the consultation
forms via post, not thinking that they would 'have to' go to a
consultation event in order to get them. Many of our neighbours
were totally unaware of the existence of any consultation
forms!
In the feedback forms it is unnacceptable tha the public is not
able to write an oppinion. Instead it is a totally closed
questionairre and the National Grid and SPEN have divised their own
answers for us to merely tick a box.
ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT.
The wildlife that lives in this natural habitat will be at serious
risk from the impact of your proposals if they were to go ahead. I
do not think that your staff had rearly enough information about
the wildlife in the area to answer any of my concernes at your
consultation event. Much of this wildlife is rare and protected.
Especially in areas you are proposing to transform like Dyfnant
Forest. Does this mean nothing to you?
Flora and Fauna can thrive in this unspoilt area of ancient
grassland and you propose to industrialise this area, destroying
natural habitat. You will effect peate bogs, wildflowers and
nesting birds.
We have lakes scattered around our home with different species of
bird flying over all the time. Pylons and turbines would be bang
smack in the way of their flyte path!
There are curlews, bats, pine martins, water vole, foxes and
badgers, Owl, red kites, otters, great crested newt, and many other
important species not to forget the fungi and wild flowers.
TRAFFIC ISSUES
Roads to potential hub sites are unsuitable for large abnormal
loads. The cost of modifying these roads would be great. The impact
on residents daily life would be unnacceptable.
There is also concerne about the Air Ambulance which is crucial to
the rural community . Because of the nature of the rugged landscape
the Air Ambulance- which has already had to attend to many
incidents in this valley- has difficulty finding suitable ground to
land on. Once Pylons and windfarms are built this would become very
difficult.
HEALTH ISSUES
It is not only childhood leukaemia that is at risk from the high
voltage pylons/lines, but also adult cancers, heart disease,
Altzheimers disease, depression, suicide and miscarrage, headaches
and lethargy. The most recent evidence reported
in your booklet 'Electric and magnetic fields' by ENA has a written
piece by the National Radiological protection board, and states
that there is a 'possibility' that 'intense and prolonged exposures
to magnetic fields'- which would be the case of many childred
living in proximity of these pylons- 'can increase the risk of
leaukaemia in children'. The National grid are proposing to place a
potential death scentance on myself and fellow children in this
area. If your windfarms go ahead, then the pylons will be built.
Not only National Grid but yours too! The cumulative effect of
these pylons would be ridiculous and should not go
ahead.
NO SIGNIFICANT GAIN
The target for windfarm capacity in the original Tan 8 is 800MW for
all of wales. In wales in 2010 the load factor (efficiency) of the
windfarm fleet was about 18%. Going by the figure of 23% this would
mean the average output after a year will be only 184MW. This is
less than 4% of the welsh Assembly government's renewable energy
target. What is the point?! We should be looking at other energy
and encouraging 'saving' energy.
70%of the time the wind does not blow strongly enough and wind
energy has to be backed up by conventional power (gas or coal
fired).
At our recent meeting with a SPEN reprasentative we were informed
that there is NO NEED FOR 50 METER 400KV PYLONS. We are aware that
there is a conflict between the National Grid implying that there
is a need for 'two' lines but SPEN actualy only need 'one'line for
their capacity. This would mean that there is a serious case for
undergrounding with only one cable. Why press for the need of
pylons when there is NO
NEED.
We will not allow these proposals to go ahead. It is rediculous. We
have learnt our lesson as a nation from episodes in welsh history
such as the flooding of our valleys for reservoirs. We do not want
this fate for children like me. Mid wales will fight against these
proposals. Tan 8 was formulated by the welsh assembly government
too long ago in 2005! These proposals are seriously flawed and must
be stopped.
Ms June Watts